Studies have shown that too much attention to the quality of one’s performance is associated with more superficial thinking, less interest in whatever one is doing, less perseverance in the face of failure, and a tendency to attribute the outcome to innate ability and other factors thought to be beyond one’s control.I agree with this statement. Students who are most interested in receiving the highest grade possible may be so focused on giving the teacher what they think the teacher wants that they may not explore their own opinions and ideas for the project. If a student is not told exactly what to do for an assignment, or exactly what information to put in an assignment, the student will be forced to rely on their own creativity and knowledge to fulfill the assignment. This would lead to more genuine and complete work.
I recently attended a masterclass taught by the countertenor, Philippe Jaroussky. Mr. Jaroussky achieved international fame through his hard work. When his teachers told him he could not be a countertenor, he did not allow their words to limit his musical pursuit. Teachers sometimes have a rubric in their mind that tells them what they believe makes an excellent countertenor, soprano, violist, pianist, etc. However, a musician is more than check marks on a list of standards. Mr. Jaroussky ignored these standards and pushed himself beyond them. He found success because he was intrinsically motivated to be the best musician that he could, not because he followed everyone's standards. When he performs, this passion and unique ability is part of what makes him so enjoyable to watch. Mr. Jaroussky knew that many of us in the audience aspire to be great musicians and continue to pursue this goal. He advised us not to try to give judges and directors what you think they want when auditioning, instead show them the best version of yourself and your music. Like all art, music is about interpretation and not everyone will agree. You must be able to form your own opinions and always seek to grow to be a musician.
Furthermore, rubrics can help to limit students by giving them the opportunity to decide how much work they would like to put in to a project, and how much they would like to leave out. It allows them to weigh the loss of credit to the amount of effort that they put in.
Each year I adjudicate a music competition for high schoolers. Adjudicators score students based on a rubric provided by the organization. The students who score highest in each section; vocal, band, orchestra, or jazz are selected to join the ensemble. This rubric is necessary because hundreds of students audition in front of different adjudicators and the organization needs a way to select students fairly. Although this rubric covers many criteria that make up a good musician, it is impossible to cover all. The rubric also gives students and their teachers the opportunity to strategize in a way that is not a fair representation of them as musicians, and denies the student an opportunity to assess their own progress and abilities. As part of the audition, students must sight read. On the rubric students receive points for maintaining a steady tempo, maintaining the key, and note accuracy. For most students, note accuracy is the most difficult part. Some teachers instruct their students to focus on the rhythm and sing everything on the same note. Therefore, the points they receive for rhythm and maintaining a key outweighs the points they lose for note accuracy. Students who advance because of this strategy over students who tried to do the sight reading fully may not always be better musicians.
However, when assigning students tasks, clarity is very important. It would not be fair to deduct points for not including something the student did not know was expected. Rubrics are a quick tool that can make their expectations clear, but this is often used as a crutch. Teachers should be able to make their expectations clear, without relying on the crutch of rubrics.
I believe with music, students should be assessed on effort and improvement. This can be difficult to assess, so it requires lots of communication between the teacher and the individual students. I would assess students at the beginning and set goals for the students to achieve. If a teacher makes these goals important to the student the student will not be limited to them. The teacher and student must have a constant dialogue on what can be improved. Therefore, the teacher may make their expectations clear, without setting limitations. If teachers believe in the students and give them the opportunity for improvement, students will be validated and will want to work hard for themselves and their work will be more genuine and organic.